From Experience To Structure

Why
This
Model.

How Tom Projects evolved from fragmented agricultural land sales into structured farmland projects built around scale, water discipline, and operating control.

WhereWe Began.

Starting Point

Tom Projects began in 2019 with agricultural land development in Türkiye, selling plots from one hectare upward to participants who wanted land ownership with operational support. The model grew quickly. Over several years, it also revealed its structural limits.

The original question was simple: could we give participants real ownership of productive agricultural land without requiring them to become farmers? The answer turned out to be yes — but the structure needed to evolve.

Why SmallPlots DidNot Work.

Fragmented land ownership created operational problems at every stage. These are not hypothetical. They are what we observed.

Problem 01

Water planning requires scale

Wells, pumps, and drip irrigation systems do not work economically at one-hectare increments. Water infrastructure built for small plots runs at a loss and tends to degrade. Scale — 10 hectares or more per water system — is the minimum for viable long-term operation.

Problem 02

Field operations require continuity

Hand-off between neighbouring owners created inconsistent protocols. Trees planted at the same time but managed differently produced very different results by year five. A single team managing a single orchard outperforms a dozen owners each managing a slice.

Problem 03

Reporting requires standardisation

Hundreds of separate titles made unified reporting impractical. Participants received inconsistent updates. Accountability diffused across too many parties. The SPV model solved this: one entity, one set of books, one consistent report.

Problem 04

Execution requires control

Decisions made at the small-plot level slowed orchard-level management. Optimisations that would benefit all plots got blocked by individual preferences. Centralised execution with proportional ownership turned out to be the better structure.

MinimumScale.Full Control.

The current model narrows future projects to the scale that supports proper irrigation, disciplined operations, and stable long-term management.

01

Private farmland: Egypt from 50 feddans, Türkiye from 5 hectares.

Minimum operational scale for water infrastructure to work economically. Below this threshold, the water plan doesn't add up.

02

Shared ownership: SPV structure holds the full project.

One legal entity, not hundreds of individual titles. Clean governance, consistent reporting, defined exit mechanics.

03

Only larger, structured projects going forward.

No return to fragmented retail plot logic. Quality over volume. Slower growth than the old model. Better long-term outcomes.

04

Operations controlled by Tom Projects, not contracted out.

The team that structures the project is the team that runs it. Permanent in-country staff. No passing the operational responsibility to someone else.

ProductiveLand. LongHorizons.

0
Global Population · 2050
0
Olive Productive Years
50–100
Walnut Orchard Lifespan
Productive Duration

Farmland is one of the few asset classes with productive output measured in decades. Olive trees produce commercially for 30+ years. Walnut orchards produce for 50 to 100+ years. Both improve with maturity rather than deteriorating — a profile that distinguishes agricultural assets from most depreciating investments.

Demand Structure

Global population is projected to reach approximately 9.7 billion by 2050, while arable land per capita continues to decline. The supply side is constrained by finite usable land. The demand side grows with every additional consumer. The arithmetic of food production favours the owner of productive land.

Market Correlation

Agricultural yield is tied to biological output, not equity cycles or interest rate movements. Farmland has historically shown low correlation to public markets and inflation-resistance through food price dynamics. It is not a short-duration asset. It is not liquid. It is long, slow, and durable.

StrategicQuestions.

FAQ · Strategy
You can, and for some participants it's the right choice. Private Farmland through Tom Projects exists specifically for that path — direct title, operational scale, and professional management. The Shared Ownership route exists for participants who want productive agricultural ownership without committing to $350,000+ and without managing operations themselves.
Farmland has three distinguishing characteristics: (1) productive output tied to biological yield, measured in decades; (2) structural demand tied to food security rather than financial cycles; (3) physical scarcity that cannot be manufactured. Not every long-duration asset shares these properties. Farmland does.
Both countries offer what the crops require: climate fit, water access, established agricultural infrastructure, clean freehold mechanics, and access to export markets. Türkiye provides direct freehold title for foreign participants. Egypt offers scale, sun, and government-backed reclamation zones. The two geographies also give project diversification across different climate and political exposures.
Chandler walnut and Koroneiki-Picual olive are varieties with long established performance data, predictable production curves, and strong export markets. Walnut fits the Anatolian climate profile. Olive fits the Egyptian desert climate with irrigation. Both are permanent crops with multi-decade productive life — aligned with the long horizon of the participation model.
For olive: commercial production tapers around year 30, but trees can continue to produce for many decades longer with managed intervention. Replanting decisions are made at the SPV level, with participant consent per governing documents. For walnut: productive lifespan extends 50 to 100+ years, well beyond typical participant horizons. End-of-life decisions are governed by the SPV or the private management agreement.
Explore The Projects

See The
Active
Offerings.